This assignment does not count toward the final grade.

DUE: (optional) GC Wk13 SUBMIT Extra Credit: Case Study DROPBOX

  • Due Nov 24, 2024 by 11:59pm
  • Points 0
  • Submitting an external tool
  • Attempts 0
  • Allowed Attempts 1
  • Available until Nov 24, 2024 at 11:59pm
This assignment was locked Nov 24, 2024 at 11:59pm.

Extra Credit Case Study

More information is available on-line at

GC Extra Credit--Case Study Option (for up to 100 points)

NOTE: Zero points ("0 pts") setting is necessary for the Canvas Gradebook to work properly

 

AVISO: Late Extra Credit Papers will not be accepted unless (1) arrangements for an alternate date have been arranged in advance, or (2) medical emergencies or similar extraordinary unexpected circumstances make it unfeasible to turn in the assignment by the announced due date. Why?

1732514399 11/24/2024 11:59pm

Rubric

GC Extra Credit: Case Study Rubric 2.0
GC Extra Credit: Case Study Rubric 2.0
Criteria Ratings Pts
Quality of Initial Discussion Post
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
90 to >72.0 pts Initial post thoroughly addresses each prompt of the assignment, using examples from the readings and other course materials.
72 to >54.0 pts Initial post addresses each prompt of the assignment, and somewhat uses examples from the readings and other course materials.
54 to >36.0 pts Initial post only somewhat addresses each prompt of the assignment. Minimal to no use of examples from the readings and other course materials.
36 to >0.0 pts Minimal references to prompt of assignment. Does not use support from text or materials to support post.
0 pts No references to prompt of assignment. Does not use support from text or materials to support post.
pts
90 pts
--
Additional Comments
Organization, Style, Tone
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
5 to >4.0 pts Structure of the postings are consistently clear and easy to follow. The postings are enhanced by the organization and structure. Academic tone used.
4 to >3.0 pts The structure and organization of the discussion postings are good but could be strengthened to increase the impact of the posting. Somewhat of an academic tone used.
3 to >2.0 pts The structure and organization of the discussion postings are OK but could be strengthened to increase the impact of the posting.
2 to >0.0 pts Structure of the discussion postings is not easy to follow. Paragraph transitions need improvement. Informal tone used.
0 pts Lack of organization and structure detracts from the message of the writer. Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts. Informal tone used.
pts
5 pts
--
Additional Comments
Grammar, Punctuation, Spelling, & Proofreading
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
5 to >4.0 pts Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
4 to >3.0 pts Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are usually followed; spelling is correct.
3 to >2.0 pts Basic/common rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are usually followed; spelling is correct.
2 to >0.0 pts Discussion postings contain several grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
0 pts Discussion postings contain numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
pts
5 pts
--
Additional Comments
Total Points: 100 out of 100