GC Discussion Writing Samples
Return to Discussion Criteria, Grading, and Policies
Over the years students in this introductory class have requested examples of Discussion items. The examples below are a response to that, selected to represent high, medium, and low scores.
The Discussion example and the sample responses are taken from a real class forum discussion and from among actual student responses in the ANTH 3635 ANTHROPOLOGY OF EUROPE class.
BACKGROUND:
That class also uses the same textbook as ours, Understanding Global Cultures: Metaphorical Journeys Through 34 Nations, Clusters of Nations, Continents, and Diversity, Sixth Edition. The Anthropology of Europe class focuses on the European chapters of Understanding Global Cultures that are not specifically assigned in this course. Included in that are Chapter 34: The Spanish Bullfight, and Chapter 35: The Portuguese Bullfight.
The Anthropology of Europe class, like this one, is also assigned the feature-length film Extranjeras (Foreign Women), a film based in Spain.
And the class also is assigned a slide deck on Spain.
This Discussion example was part of those materials focused on the Iberian Peninsula.
NOTES:
-
- Sometime folks look at these suggestions and simply make their answers after that longer. In this class, and particularly for the Discussions, the length of the discussion is not a main concern. The main rating has to do primarily with content, and whether or not you actually respond directly to the discussion prompts (i.e., the "questions"), and how you present your response.
- When it asks you to briefly summarize, do that.
- When it asks you to give specific examples from the articles, give specific examples from the articles.
- Pay special attention that listing a category of things is not "giving a specific example".
- For example (from below), "Bullfighting began as a religious ritual. . . ."; "a religious ritual" is a category [and, in addition, there is no way to know if the statement is true].
A specific example would be something like, "the earliest suggestion that bulls were part of the ritual life in Spain comes from the world-famous Cave of Altamira near Santillana del Mar, Cantabria. The famed cave paintings, discovered in 1868, date from the Upper Paleolithic, about 36,000 years ago ('The discovery of Altamira'. Museo Nacional y Centro de Investigación de Altamira, n.d.)".
- A SIDE NOTE: If you were giving this example in response to an Essay Exam question, it would be sufficient to say, "the earliest suggestion that bulls were part of the ritual life in Spain comes from the world-famous Cave of Altamira". The reason for that is that you have limited time to finish an exam. In a Discussion, it would be better to add some interesting clarifying information.
- A SIDE NOTE: If you were giving this example in response to an Essay Exam question, it would be sufficient to say, "the earliest suggestion that bulls were part of the ritual life in Spain comes from the world-famous Cave of Altamira". The reason for that is that you have limited time to finish an exam. In a Discussion, it would be better to add some interesting clarifying information.
- Another example (on a different subject): "the CAFOs [Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations] pollute the air"; "the CAFOs" is a category, not a specific example. And air pollution is a category, not a specific example.
A specific example, with a reliable source, would be something like "the raising of livestock by CAFOs accounts for somewhere between 11% and 20% of all greenhouse gas emissions (The Humane League Links to an external site., Accessed 23 June 2024)".
- For example (from below), "Bullfighting began as a religious ritual. . . ."; "a religious ritual" is a category [and, in addition, there is no way to know if the statement is true].
- Pay special attention that listing a category of things is not "giving a specific example".
- Sometime folks look at these suggestions and simply make their answers after that longer. In this class, and particularly for the Discussions, the length of the discussion is not a main concern. The main rating has to do primarily with content, and whether or not you actually respond directly to the discussion prompts (i.e., the "questions"), and how you present your response.
Discussion Posting Samples w/scores follow.
|
Student Answer/Response The argument to include the bullfight in the 2028 Olympics could be made either way. Bullfighting has a cultural and historical significance but there are also other concerns such as the danger that bullfighting represents and the fact that many consider it to be cruel to the animals. |
Student Answer/Response I do not think that the bullfight should be admitted into the Olympic games, but not for the normal reasons. When I had the chance to visit Spain and see a bullfight live I found it to be a great exhibition of their culture if not exactly my taste in entertainment. While there issues disputed around animal cruelty and the level of danger the issue I raise is the exclusion of other sports from the Olympics in the past. Most recently baseball has been removed because of the dominance of the United States despite footings in South America, Canada, and Japan. I find the case of the bullfight to be similar. It holds more of a cultural significance than an international one. The bullfight is only practiced in Spain, Portugal, and a few Latin American nations due to Spanish and Portuguese influence. A demonstration so linked to the culture of these nations cannot be totally understood and evenly competed against when a person does not come from a place where the bullfight is common place. The Olympic games are supposed to bring the best athletes from around the world together to compete in sports which span much of the globe. While certain sports tend to have dominant or weak nations and tropical nations are at an inherent disadvantage in the winter games, I feel that the bullfight should not be added to the Olympic Games in 2028. It is only popular in a few areas of the world and is strongly opposed by both animal rights groups and those speaking for athlete safety. While the average match ends with a dead bull there is always the possibility of a dead matador. |
Student Answer/Response See above for original Discussion Question Although it would be very interesting and entertaining to watch bullfighting as a "demonstration sport" for the Summer Olympics, I believe that it is too dangerous to be seen at the Olympics. Every two years, the Winter and Summer Olympics both draw in an incredible amount of people, including people in attendance and people viewing on TV. Bullfighting began as a religious ritual, but is now a very controversial and extremely dangerous "activity." As said in the "60 Minutes" film, "bullfighting always ends in death, usually the bull but sometimes the matador," for the chance that the matador would die, I think it would be too controversial for this sport to be included in the Olympics, as millions of people would see this tragedy happen. Unlike some of the sports included in the Olympics, fighting a 1,000 pound bull can be life altering. One minor mistake could cause the matador to lose their own life, not just the Olympic competition. The Blood Brothers, Francisco Rivera Ordonez and his brother Cayetano lost their father while he was fighting bulls in the ring. Also, some countries would not have enough bulls for practice, and one event at the Summer Olympics would wipe out a lot of bulls. The immeasurable amount of bulls that would get killed and injured for the pleasure of watching this activity would upset an enormous amount of people and animal rights groups such as PETA. |
Student Answer/Response See above for original Discussion Question I believe that if Bullfighting is actually considered as a "demonstration sport" in the Olympics of 2028, it could be interesting. How many countries would actually participate in the event, or would it be to celebrate the special hobby of the Spanish and Portuguese peoples? It's definitely a cultural thing, but it is also dangerous. Would we internationally want to support something so dangerous? I think they should because it is embracing the local culture of where the summer Olympics will be held, but on the other hand I don't support the sport itself because of how dangerous it really is.
|
Student Answer/Response 1. I do not think that bullfighting should be a demonstration sport for the Olympics because it involves animals. This itself can make a lot of controversy but the fact that it all ends with the bull dying makes it even worse. |
---|
Student Answer/Response
Sum of ratings: 0 - 0 - 4 - 4 = 8/18 See above for original Discussion Question
No, I don't think it should be. |
---|
Student Answer/Response
Sum of ratings: 0 - 1 - 3 - 3 = 7/18 See above for original Discussion Question
I do not think that bullfighting should be allowed as an olympic demonstration sport. While I understand the beauty and significance of bullfighting to Spanish culture, I think the topic is just too controversial. |
---|
Student Answer/Response
Sum of ratings: 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 = 0/18 See above for original Discussion Question
No Response
|
---|
Return to Discussion Criteria, Grading, and Policies