Innovators, be they individual inventors, small firms or large companies will inevitably want to protect the fruits of their intellectual labor. For inventions having market potential, protecting one’s intellectual property could be the sine qua non of profitability — for, without the proper protection, any competitor would be able to copy and profit from the intellectual property of another.
The patent systems in the United States and many other nations have been enacted with the goal of preventing such inequities by providing innovators with the exclusive rights, for twenty years, to manufacture and sell their inventions. In exchange for such exclusivity, the inventors agree to provide the public with a disclosure of the innovative aspects of their invention.
Inventors are frequently faced with the question of whether to hire a professional to pursue protection for their inventions or whether to attempt to file a patent application on their own. More often than not, this decision turns on a single factor: the cost of paying a patent attorney to prosecute the application and to represent the inventor before the Patent Office. However, an inventor should consider a number of factors about the role of a patent attorney in the patent prosecution process before making a decision. InventHelp is among the popular patent attorneys and they could help you in that. You should learn how they can be helpful to you here: https://southfloridareporter.com/how-inventhelp-can-assist-with-new-invention-ideas/
The job of a patent attorney is not simply to obtain a patent for their client but to make sure that the client has the strongest protection available for their invention. The drafting of a patent application is as much an art as it is a science, and the patent attorney can draw on their years of experience in patent prosecution — as well as the cumulative experience of the attorney’s firm — to create an application that protects the broadest variations of a client’s invention.
At the same time, the patent attorney must delineate precisely the metes and bounds of the patent so that the patent office will deem the invention patentable over the technology that has come before. The way that a patent application is written may have significant consequences down the road for the inventor’s profitability, as well as for the validity of the patent itself.
The patent attorney will also be familiar with the patent prosecution process, the guidelines of the MPEP, and the details of the patent laws. All of these factors are vital to obtaining a strong, valid patent. Virtually every utility patent application will get rejected by the Patent and Trademark Office on the first try and would have to be amended to get around the prior art. In such situations, every amendment to a claim may have consequences down the line for the breadth and validity of the patent. An experienced patent attorney will know how to amend the claims of the patent to get around the rejection while still protecting the client’s innovations. You can find reviews of patent attorneys here: https://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/InventHelp-Reviews-E152162.htm
Once a patent is granted, it is important to consider any potential litigation that may appear down the line. For example, a competitor may disregard the existence of a patent and decide to sell a patented product; then, when faced with allegations of infringement, the competitor would attempt to invalidate the patent that they are infringing. In such a case, not only would it be important to retain an experienced patent attorney for the litigation, but the validity of the patent may turn on the quality of the original patent application and its prosecution history.
The hiring of a patent attorney should thus be seen as an investment — a comparatively small upfront cost that may save the inventor a significant amount of money down the line and that may very well make the difference between an invalid patent and an enforceable asset that protects the inventor’s intellectual property rights.