You need to have JavaScript enabled in order to access this site.

CE Due: Kypseli Paper I (Wk 2)

Due Jan 20, 2018 by 11:59pm
Points 1
Submitting a file upload

For information on Kypseli Paper I have a look at the information at
<http://www.d.umn.edu/cla/faculty/troufs/anth3635/case_studies/ceCS-Kypseli.html#title>.

When you are finished with your paper, upload your paper below.

Rubric

Title:

Keep in mind that 18 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.

Kypseli Narrative Rubric (1)

Kypseli Narrative Rubric (1)
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
LENGTH: 750 Word Minimum (3 pages) _7638 750 Word Minimum (Usually there are 250 -300 words per page, double-spaced, using 12 point Times New Roman font and 1 inch margins, ) From the Harvard Library : threshold: pts Edit criterion description	20 to >16.0 pts 750 words or more (3-3+ pages) blank 16 to >12.0 pts 625-750 words (2.5-3 pages) blank_2 12 to >8.0 pts 500-625 words (2-2.5 pages)) _5500 8 to >4.0 pts 375-500 words (1.5-2 pages) _7164 4 to >0.0 pts 250-375 words (1-1.5 pages) _3823 0 to >0 pts less than 250 words _2541 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 20 pts --
Title _3405 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	5 to >4.0 pts Title is relevant and clear, and provides a guide to what follows by using a subtitle (if appropriate) _4660 4 to >3.0 pts Title is relevant and clear 5181_90 3 to >2.0 pts Title is relevant _8477 2 to >1.0 pts Title is related to the topic _7883 1 to >0.0 pts Title is not relevant _6577 0 to >0 pts No title _52 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --
Writing Techniques _7975 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	10 to >8.0 pts The writer skillfully uses writing techniques to portray events, clearly separating description from analysis _3825 8 to >6.0 pts The writer skillfully uses writing techniques to portray events 5181_2390 6 to >4.0 pts The writer's portrayal of events meets basic requirements _6047 4 to >2.0 pts The writer's portrayal of events is uneven _7775 2 to >0.0 pts The writer's portrayal of events fails to present important aspects of the film _6410 0 to >0 pts The writer's portrayal of events is below expectations _7401 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 10 pts --
Diction/word choice _2037 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	10 to >8.0 pts Precise language is chosen carefully, using proper technical terms when appropriate _6841 8 to >6.0 pts Word choice is precise, resulting in clear description and analysis _9709 6 to >4.0 pts Words are reasonably accurate and clear _5212 4 to >2.0 pts Limited, inappropriate or vague word choice conveys only a general meaning _8260 2 to >0.0 pts Somewhat varied word choice, not always resulting in a clear description or analysis _4759 0 to >0 pts Word choice is simple, repetitive, and inaccurate _3139 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 10 pts --
Strong introduction _455 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	10 to >8.0 pts Well-developed introduction engages the reader and creates interest. Contains detailed information to get the reader situated in the story. _4675 8 to >6.0 pts Introduction creates interest. Background information is clear. _3479 6 to >4.0 pts Introduction adequately explains the background, but may lack detail. _2292 4 to >2.0 pts An attempt is made at an introduction, but no background information is provided. _492 2 to >0.0 pts Background is random, unclear, or unrelated to the rest of the narrative. _521 0 to >0 pts Not evident. _4219 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 10 pts --
Organization _2639 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	10 to >8.0 pts The organizational structure is coherent with a sense of wholeness and balance. Transitions are graceful and mature. _5747 8 to >6.0 pts The organizational structure is coherent with a sense of wholeness. Transitions are present. _22 6 to >4.0 pts The organizational structure has some sense of wholeness although some drifting may occur. _3462 4 to >2.0 pts A simple organizational structure is apparent, although the focus may shift or the paper may lack a sense of wholeness. _5882 2 to >0.0 pts There is weak development and organization. _4438 0 to >0 pts Not evident. _9765 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 10 pts --
Mechanics (grammar, usage, punctuation). MLA or APA or Chicago/Turabian Style (use whichever style with which you are familiar) Cf., OWL <https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/section/2/> _1257 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	10 to >8.0 pts Excellent control over a wide range of standard writing conventions. Writer uses them with accuracy and creativity. _3999 8 to >6.0 pts Good control over a wide range of standard writing conventions. _460 6 to >4.0 pts Adequate control of the most widely used writing conventions. _7129 4 to >2.0 pts Follows writing conventions most of the time. _4295 2 to >0.0 pts Lack of control of writing conventions often impairs understanding. _5894 0 to >0 pts The errors in this essay make it impossible to understand. _3155 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 10 pts --
Personal Reaction 5181_6850 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	10 to >8.0 pts Excellent, including thoughtful statement(s) of reasons for reaction(s) 5181_3227 8 to >6.0 pts Very good statement, with some dicsussion of why response(s) was/were they way they were 5181_6868 6 to >4.0 pts Good 5181_4972 4 to >2.0 pts Basic response, with little/no statement of reasons 5181_125 2 to >0.0 pts Formulaic response 5181_1911 0 to >0 pts Reaction section missing 5181_5535 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 10 pts --
Kypseli II Re-view Personal Reaction Paragraph(s) (Added the last week of class.) 5181_3087 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	10 to >8.0 pts Excellent, including thoughtful statement(s) of reasons for reaction(s) 5181_1173 8 to >6.0 pts Very good statement, with some dicsussion of why response(s) was/were they way they were 5181_7453 6 to >4.0 pts Good 5181_1305 4 to >2.0 pts Basic response, with little/no statement of reasons 5181_7842 2 to >0.0 pts Formulaic response 5181_6559 0 to >0 pts Reaction section missing 5181_7150 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 10 pts --
Proofreading 5181_6424 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	5 to >4.0 pts Excellent job, with only occasional oversights 5181_6659 4 to >3.0 pts Basically good job, but with several oversights 5181_8618 3 to >2.0 pts Several typographical and basic errors remain 5181_4728 2 to >1.0 pts Several typographical and basic errors remain throughout the paper 5181_8057 1 to >0.0 pts Excessive typographical and basic errors 5181_9257 0 to >0 pts Apparently not proofread 5181_1145 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --
Kypseli Part I Initial Reaction Paper Submitted 5181_9632 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	1 to >0.0 pts Paper submitted 5181_1240 0 to >0 pts Paper not submitted 5181_5578 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 1 pts --
Grade and "Curve" Information is at <http://www.d.umn.edu/cla/faculty/troufs/anth3635/cegrades.html#title> A = 94 and above 5181_3424 threshold: pts Edit criterion description	0 to >0.0 pts 5181_3591 0 to >0 pts 5181_8079 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 0 pts --
Description of criterion threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Delete criterion row	5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --

Rubric

Title:

Find a Rubric

Title

Title
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Description of criterion threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Delete criterion row	5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --
Description of criterion threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Delete criterion row	5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --