Discussion 5

  • Due Oct 9, 2022 by 11:59pm
  • Points 10
  • Submitting a discussion post

Instructions

Review the Discussion Guidelines Links to an external site. for general instructions on discussions.

Your initial post is due at 11:59 PM on Thursday. Your responses/comments are due by 11:59 PM on Sunday.

To view grading details, click on the gear icon in the upper right corner and select "Show Rubric". 

Discuss

This module discusses the management of the environment and potential hazards such as CBRNE (chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, explosive) and its impact on the work environment.

Part 1. Initial Post

  1. Select a state with an approved state implementation plan (SIP) and then describe the regulatory requirements for a company wanting to expand or change a production process or otherwise increase its output of a criteria air pollutant.
  2. What is the difference between maximum contaminant levels (MCL) and maximum contaminant level goals? Provide an example of a product and MCL, its implications, and why we should be concerned.
  3. RCRA was enacted by Congress in 1976 and amended in 1984. How effective has it been and provide an example supporting your statement.
  4. What is the minimum number of hours of training required for workers who will respond to hazardous material spills and releases? What are some factors that determine the amount of training?

Part 2: Responses

Consider comparisons and contrasts, if present, of various states.

1665377940 10/09/2022 11:59pm

Rubric

CMGT 4305 Discussions
CMGT 4305 Discussions
Criteria Ratings Pts
Original Post
Point of view grounded in course concepts, theories, and materials.
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
2 pts Exemplary Applies and analyzes most concepts, theories, or materials to argue or support a point of view.
1.5 pts Proficient Applies some relevant course concepts, theories, or materials, to argue or support a point of view.
1 pts Below Expectations Does not include a point of view, or a point of view is not developed.
pts
2 pts
--
Additional Comments
Original Post
Relevant data or examples; support from authoritative sources.
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
2 pts Exemplary Applies relevant information or real-world examples and discusses reasoned implications or conclusions.
1.5 pts Proficient Applies relevant information or real world examples.
1 pts Below Expectations Does not apply information or examples to support point of view.
pts
2 pts
--
Additional Comments
Original Post
Appropriate tone and quality of writing.
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
2 pts Exemplary Tone is appropriate for this type of discussion. Spelling usage and grammar are nearly perfect.
1.5 pts Proficient Tone is generally appropriate. Isolated errors in spelling, usage, and grammar.
1 pts Below Expectations Tone is not appropriate, or errors are distracting.
pts
2 pts
--
Additional Comments
Responses
Active participation and collaboration
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
2 pts Exemplary Extends or expands the class conversation through meaningful, relevant, respectful follow-up to at least two-classmates during the weeks discussion.
1.5 pts Proficient Continues the class conversation by offering relevant responses to at least two-classmates during the weeks discussion.
1 pts Below Expectations Offers no responses to classmates or responses are not substantive or relevant.
pts
2 pts
--
Additional Comments
Responses
Creating community
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
2 pts Exemplary Frequently attempts to motivate the group discussion, presents creative approaches to the topic, can differ or counter peers points with diplomacy, if applicable. Creates community in the discussion.
1.5 pts Proficient Displays an effort to become involved with the group and interacts with others.
1 pts Below Expectations Argumentative or abrasive. No peer interaction.
pts
2 pts
--
Additional Comments
Total Points: 10 out of 10