Prepare Quiz: Emergency Management

  • Due Dec 4, 2022 by 11:59pm
  • Points 20
  • Submitting a text entry box, a website url, or a file upload
  • Available until Dec 4, 2022 at 11:59pm
This assignment was locked Dec 4, 2022 at 11:59pm.

Instructions

Your company understands the importance of environmental safety and health management and its importance to the business environment. As such, emergency management is a company priority. You have been given the responsibility of developing emergency and disaster management training for your company employees. 

Training you are developing requires employees to view the online training videos and materials contained in Modules 12 and 13, Emergency Management and Disaster Systems and Planning.  

 You want to provide an incentive for employees to view the videos and materials. In addition, you want to assess the effectiveness of the training and employee knowledge for the most important emergency management elements for the company. One of the learning assessments will be a quiz. Prepare a 10-question quiz to give to employees using the following quiz criteria:

  1. Use question formats up to 25% true or false, with a combination of multiple choice and other formats.
  2. Consider the audience has various levels of education.

Assignment Criteria

  1. For purposes of the assignment, indicate the correct answer(s) on the submitted quiz.
  2. Submit the quiz in both a Word and PDF format.
  3. Create with 12 point font.

The rubrics for grading are the same as used for the Case Study assignment.

Submission

Click on Submit Assignment button above to upload documents or share links to your work. Submit your work before the due date.

1670219999 12/04/2022 11:59pm

Rubric

CMGT 4305 Prepare Quiz: Emergency Management
CMGT 4305 Prepare Quiz: Emergency Management
Criteria Ratings Pts
Accuracy
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
5 to >4.5 pts Exemplary All facts included are correct and complete; facts complement the argument or reinforce the thesis and are appropriate to the reader’s level of understanding. No spelling or grammar errors.
4.5 to >4.0 pts Proficient All facts are correct, mostly complement or reinforce the argument, and are appropriate to the reader’s level of understanding. ErErrors may occur but are few and do not markedly distract the reader.
4 to >3.5 pts Developing All major facts are correct but may be missing crucial contextual information or be tangential to the argument or thesis. Generally appropriate for the audience. Errors may occur but are few; while they occasionally distract the reader, they do not detract from comprehension.
3.5 to >0 pts Below Expectations At least one, and sometimes more, major facts are incorrect; facts are taken out of context so they are distorted; facts are irrelevant to the argument or inappropriate to the audience.Errors occur frequently and negatively affect the reader’s comprehension. The writer has not proofread.
pts
5 pts
--
Additional Comments
Development
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
5 to >4.5 pts Exemplary The points or claims are fully explained and supported. The writer provides helpful examples or details. When necessary, the writer anticipates or refutes counterarguments. Provides supporting materials where appropriate.
4.5 to >4.0 pts Proficient All important points or claims are adequately explained and supported with some extra detail.
4 to >3.5 pts Developing Most points or claims are adequately explained and supported but with minimal detail. Some minor points may be left unexplained or unsupported.
3.5 to >0 pts Below Expectations Many of the points are unexplained or unsupported, or inadequately explained or supported.
pts
5 pts
--
Additional Comments
Audience
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
5 to >4.5 pts Exemplary The writer employs appropriate word choice, style, and content based on audience and genre. It is clear who the intended reader would be.
4.5 to >4.0 pts Proficient There is some attempt to address the specified audience, but the writer sometimes lapses into an alternate style (for example too academic for a newsletter).
4 to >3.5 pts Developing The writer tends to forget the audience and simply writes about the topic. Overall the language is general or the writer simply writes for the teacher.
3.5 to >0 pts Below Expectations The writer ignores the needs of the audience and the conventions of the genre.
pts
5 pts
--
Additional Comments
Organization
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
5 to >4.5 pts Exemplary The whole document has a clear and obvious organization which makes it easy to read and understand; Paragraphs have a clear topic or function and are of an appropriate length. All parts of the document support the main point. Information presented in a clear, compelling manner.
4.5 to >4.0 pts Proficient Most of the document has a clear and obvious organization which makes it easy to read and understand; the document can be skimmed easily. Most paragraphs have a clear topic or function and are of an appropriate length. Information presented appropriately.
4 to >3.5 pts Developing The principle of organization may not always be clear, or there may be some straying from the thesis or main point. There may be some paragraphs which are very long or very short for no obvious reason. Information presented in an unclear manner.
3.5 to >0 pts Below Expectations There is no organization; most paragraphs are very long or very short for no obvious reason. Information is not clear or confusing.
pts
5 pts
--
Additional Comments
Total Points: 20 out of 20