Case Study Part 4

  • Due Dec 11, 2022 by 11:59pm
  • Points 20
  • Submitting a file upload

Instructions

Emergency Management & Business Continuity

While the company’s daily environmental health and safety programs have seen improvements, the company has found that emergency management and disasters have had a greater impact to the workforce and company’s finances in recent years.   As such, the company is developing a plan to ensure that they will be able to respond to emergencies and continue to operate. These emergencies may be related to natural disasters, communicable diseases, terrorism, etc.

You have been promoted to Construction Operations Vice President and the CEO has asked you to provide an outline for an Emergency Management Plan Plan in case of various emergencies to discuss at the company’s board meeting.

Based on all your former assessments (Part 1-3 from previous weeks in the semester), provide an outline of an emergency management plan and business continuity plan.

  1. Include at least 5 functions to consider that are essential to operations during an emergency/disaster.
  2. What role can your company provide in cases of public emergencies and disasters?
  3. What are the benefits and disadvantages of being part of the public emergency management system?

Submission

Click on Submit Assignment button above to upload documents or share links to your work. Submit your work before the due date.

1670824799 12/11/2022 11:59pm

Rubric

CMGT 4305 Case Study Project Parts 1-4
CMGT 4305 Case Study Project Parts 1-4
Criteria Ratings Pts
Accuracy
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
5 to >4.5 pts Exemplary All facts included are correct and complete; facts complement the argument or reinforce the thesis and are appropriate to the reader’s level of understanding. No spelling or grammar errors.
4.5 to >4.0 pts Proficient All facts are correct, mostly complement or reinforce the argument, and are appropriate to the reader’s level of understanding. ErErrors may occur but are few and do not markedly distract the reader.
4 to >3.5 pts Developing All major facts are correct but may be missing crucial contextual information or be tangential to the argument or thesis. Generally appropriate for the audience. Errors may occur but are few; while they occasionally distract the reader, they do not detract from comprehension.
3.5 to >0 pts Below Expectations At least one, and sometimes more, major facts are incorrect; facts are taken out of context so they are distorted; facts are irrelevant to the argument or inappropriate to the audience.Errors occur frequently and negatively affect the reader’s comprehension. The writer has not proofread.
pts
5 pts
--
Additional Comments
Development
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
5 to >4.5 pts Exemplary The points or claims are fully explained and supported. The writer provides helpful examples or details. When necessary, the writer anticipates or refutes counterarguments. Provides supporting materials where appropriate.
4.5 to >4.0 pts Proficient All important points or claims are adequately explained and supported with some extra detail.
4 to >3.5 pts Developing Most points or claims are adequately explained and supported but with minimal detail. Some minor points may be left unexplained or unsupported.
3.5 to >0 pts Below Expectations Many of the points are unexplained or unsupported, or inadequately explained or supported.
pts
5 pts
--
Additional Comments
Audience
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
5 to >4.5 pts Exemplary The writer employs appropriate word choice, style, and content based on audience and genre. It is clear who the intended reader would be.
4.5 to >4.0 pts Proficient There is some attempt to address the specified audience, but the writer sometimes lapses into an alternate style (for example too academic for a newsletter).
4 to >3.5 pts Developing The writer tends to forget the audience and simply writes about the topic. Overall the language is general or the writer simply writes for the teacher.
3.5 to >0 pts Below Expectations The writer ignores the needs of the audience and the conventions of the genre.
pts
5 pts
--
Additional Comments
Organization
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
5 to >4.5 pts Exemplary The whole document has a clear and obvious organization which makes it easy to read and understand; Paragraphs have a clear topic or function and are of an appropriate length. All parts of the document support the main point. Information presented in a clear, compelling manner.
4.5 to >4.0 pts Proficient Most of the document has a clear and obvious organization which makes it easy to read and understand; the document can be skimmed easily. Most paragraphs have a clear topic or function and are of an appropriate length. Information presented appropriately.
4 to >3.5 pts Developing The principle of organization may not always be clear, or there may be some straying from the thesis or main point. There may be some paragraphs which are very long or very short for no obvious reason. Information presented in an unclear manner.
3.5 to >0 pts Below Expectations There is no organization; most paragraphs are very long or very short for no obvious reason. Information is not clear or confusing.
pts
5 pts
--
Additional Comments
Total Points: 20 out of 20