A more formal statement (a "Promissory Abstract") of what you eventually decide upon isn't due for another two weeks. Between now and then I will have a look at your informal proposal and give you some feedback on it, including instructions on how to proceed with your Promissory Abstract two weeks hence.)
15to >12.0 pts
Initial post thoroughly addresses each prompt of the assignment, including suggested topic(s), why they are interested in the topic(s), and including three or more sources of information that they think would be useful in researching the topic(s).blank
12to >9.0 pts
Initial post addresses each prompt of the assignment, and includes only vague references to sources of information that they think would be useful in researching the topic(s).4319_8505
9to >6.0 pts
Initial post only somewhat addresses each prompt of the assignment. Minimal to no references to sources of information that they think would be useful in researching the topic(s).4319_5605
6to >3.0 pts
Minimal references to prompts of assignment. Does not include reference to sources of information that they think would be useful in researching the topic(s).4319_6619
3to >0.0 pts
No clear references to prompts of assignment. Does not include reference to sources of information that they think would be useful in researching the topic(s).5253_4112
0to >0 pts
No proposal submitted by due date, or proposal fails to meaningfully address prompts of the assignment.blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
15 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization, Style, Tone, Grammar, Punctuation, Spelling, & Proofreading4319_3654
5to >4.0 pts
Structure of the proposal is consistently clear and easy to follow. The proposal is enhanced by the organization and structure. Tone may be informal, but rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed, and spelling is correct.4319_1513
4to >3.0 pts
The structure and organization of proposal are good but could be strengthened to increase the impact of the proposal. Tone may be informal, but rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are usually followed, and spelling is correct.4319_1391
3to >2.0 pts
The structure and organization of the proposal are OK but could be strengthened to increase the impact of the proposal. Basic/common rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are usually followed, and spelling is correct.5080_1789
2to >1.0 pts
Structure of the proposal is not easy to follow. Proposal contains several grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.4319_3627
1to >0.0 pts
Lack of organization and structure detracts from the message of the writer. Proposal contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.5253_446
0to >0 pts
No proposal submitted by due date, or proposal fails to meaningfully address prompts of the assignment.4319_6599
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion