You need to have JavaScript enabled in order to access this site.

Executive Summary

Due Dec 11, 2020 by 8pm
Points 70
Submitting a file upload
File Types docx, doc, and pdf

This is where you will submit your executive summary about the turbine-centrifugal pump. Organize this summary similar to a five paragraph essay. Include paragraphs on each of these topics: Design, Utility/Usefulness of Design, Manufacturability of Design, Potential Failure of Design and Ways to Mitigate Failure, End User Safety Hazards and Ways to Ensure Safety.

In this report, please answer the following questions:

How does this centrifugal pump-turbine work?

What are the uses for this centrifugal pump-turbine?

What would change if this design was scaled up?

What are some of the challenges to manufacturing this design?

How does this design make manufacturing easier?

What are some of the common parts that can fail?

How would these parts fail?

How would you ensure that parts don't fail?

Evaluate potential hazards Download potential hazards

for end users for the assembly and discuss safety improvements made to the design or suggested to make.

This report should be no more than two pages long, 12pt font.

Executive Summary Grading Rubric

Executive Summary - Total	70
Design Description	10
Utility/Usefulness of Design	10
Manufacturability of Design	10
Potential Failure of Design	10
Ways to Mitigate Failure	10
End User Safety Hazards	10
Ways to Ensure Safety	10

Rubric

Title:

Keep in mind that 67 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.

Executive Summary

Executive Summary
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Design Description 52242_9432 How does the design of the pump/turbine work. threshold: pts Edit criterion description	10 to >6.0 pts Full Marks Clear concise description of how centrifugal pump and turbine work together. 52242_8160 6 to >3.0 pts Missing Key Points Description of how turbine works missing one or two key points or includes one or two mistakes 52242_2588 3 to >0.0 pts Attempted Description is difficult to understand because of unclear logic or poor sentence structure. 84314_8712 0 to >0 pts No Marks 52242_7734 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 10 pts --
Utility/Usefulness of Design 52242_7091 What will this turbine be used for at its current size threshold: pts Edit criterion description	10 to >6.0 pts Full Marks Mentions one or more plausible uses. 52242_8016 6 to >3.0 pts Half Marks Answers are implausible 52242_9051 3 to >0.0 pts Attempted Very difficult to understand. 84314_1091 0 to >0 pts No Marks Not attempted 52242_5288 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 10 pts --
Manufacturability of Design blank How will these parts be made? threshold: pts Edit criterion description	10 to >6.0 pts Full Marks Mentions one or more plausible ways to manufacture the parts. 84314_6616 6 to >3.0 pts Half Marks Answers are implausible 84314_970 3 to >0.0 pts Attempted Very difficult to understand. 84314_2847 0 to >0 pts No Marks Not attempted 84314_4640 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 10 pts --
Potential Failure of Design 84314_2647 Discusses how and where certain parts will fail threshold: pts Edit criterion description	10 to >6.0 pts Full Marks Talks about more than one part and explains the how/why behind how the part might fail. 84314_9564 6 to >3.0 pts Half Marks Answers are implausible 84314_8197 3 to >0.0 pts Attempted Very difficult to understand. 84314_563 0 to >0 pts No Marks 84314_7048 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 10 pts --
Ways to Mitigate Failure 84314_5889 How would you insure no failure threshold: pts Edit criterion description	10 to >6.0 pts Full Marks Talks about one or more ways to mitigate failure, explaining the how/why this change will do so. 84314_3042 6 to >3.0 pts Half Marks Reasoning behind logic is flawed. 84314_6582 3 to >0.0 pts Attempted Very difficult to understand. 84314_1038 0 to >0 pts No Marks 84314_7752 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 10 pts --
End User Safety Hazard 84314_342 Discusses what are potential hazards to the user threshold: pts Edit criterion description	10 to >6.0 pts Full Marks Talks about one or more ways this design could be hazardous to the user and the reasoning. 84314_7542 6 to >3.0 pts Half Marks Reasoning behind logic is flawed. 84314_4036 3 to >0.0 pts Attempted Very difficult to understand. 84314_6586 0 to >0 pts No Marks 84314_1607 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 10 pts --
Ways to Ensure Safety 84314_5533 Discusses ways to provide safety for the user threshold: pts Edit criterion description	10 to >6.0 pts Full Marks Talks about one or more ways to ensure safety for the user and the reasoning. 84314_4069 6 to >3.0 pts Half Marks Reasoning behind logic is flawed. 84314_7933 3 to >0.0 pts Attempted Very difficult to understand. 84314_1572 0 to >0 pts No Marks 84314_2272 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 10 pts --
Description of criterion threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Delete criterion row	5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --

Rubric

Title:

Title

Title
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Description of criterion threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Delete criterion row	5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --
Description of criterion threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Delete criterion row	5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --